How To Improve Your Marriage Without Talking About It. Part 2. | Happy Life with a Russian Wife

How To Improve Your Marriage Without Talking About It. Part 2.

Posted By admin on March 22, 2010

Couple holding handsHello, dear readers,

In today’s issue, we publish the ending of the article by Barbara Graham, “How to improve your marriage without talking about it?” In the previous part, the author dwelled upon the survey results of the psychological differences between men and women, mentioning, for example, that the talk of the relationships can be physically uncomfortable for men. And also about how important it is to feel the connection with your partner through joint activities:

“It’s the connection, stupid!” exclaims Love, quickly adding that it’s not me personally she’s calling stupid. “Everyone — men, women, myself included — needs to learn that before we can communicate with words, we need to connect nonverbally. We can do that in simple ways, through touch, sex, doing things together. The deepest moments of intimacy occur when you’re not talking.”

Stosny puts it this way: “We need to stop trying to assess the bonding verbally and instead let the words come out of the bonding.” Interestingly, he adds, “When couples feel connected, men want to talk more and women need to talk less, so they meet somewhere in the middle. Being aware of the fear-shame dynamic helps.”

To illustrate the point, Love tells the story of an afternoon when she and her husband were lying in bed after showering. “I was wondering if he’d initiate sex, when all of a sudden in my mind I crossed over to his side of the bed and got a sense of what it was like to be him, never knowing if he’s going to be accepted or rejected. It was terrifying. I understood then how deeply ashamed that must make him feel,” she recalls. “It was an epiphany that changed my life.” She immediately began emphasizing compassion in her work with clients, and has come to believe — as does Stosny — that it’s even more crucial to the success of a long-term relationship than love.

The tricky part is that men and women must empathize with vulnerabilities they don’t feel to the same degree — namely fear and shame. To do this requires what the authors call binocular vision, in which each partner makes a conscious effort to consider the other’s point of view. “The problem is that when you’re angry, you’re wrong even when you’re right because you can’t see the other person’s perspective,” Stosny says. “That’s when you lose the thing you long for most, the connection.”

Okay, I get it: Connection rules. But it’s hard to imagine most people being capable of reaching out to their partners in the heat of an argument. Love and Stosny acknowledge that it’s a tall order. Still, they say, for couples to productively address the hurt that underlies anger, it helps to have a previously agreed-upon signal such as a hand gesture to keep disagreements from spiraling out of control. This doesn’t mean they should try to ignore their feelings, but instead find a way to convey that the other person matters more than whatever they’re resentful or anxious about—and then talk. The beautiful part, Love says, is that “it takes only one person to make the gesture. The partner will feel the impact, even if he or she can’t drop the anger right at that moment.”

Admittedly, this approach is most effective for couples in a precrisis state, Stosny says, “when there’s still time for the man to step up to the plate and stop withdrawing or being reactive, and for the woman to understand that her husband really does want to make her happy and to stop being so critical. Men are better able to stay in the room and listen to women if they don’t think they’re being blamed for their distress.”

But ultimately, Love adds, “couples have to decide that the relationship is more important than all those things they do that annoy each other.”

“Even when Hugh throws his sopping wet towel on the bed, forgets to put gas in the car, or stares into space when I try to tell him something that really matters to me?” I ask, only half joking.

“If you give him positive reinforcement instead of criticizing him, he’ll start doing more of the things you want him to do,” Love says.

The next night over dinner, I give it a whirl. “I love it when you put gas in the car and hang up your wet towel,” I say. He looks at me like I’ve gone off the deep end. “What’s up?” he asks suspiciously. “Why are you being so nice?”

But a few days later when I’m distraught over a potentially scary mammogram report and he jumps in too quickly to reassure me that everything will turn out fine (it does), I decide to try out the binocular vision that Love and Stosny recommend. That’s when I see that Hugh feels like a failure because he wants to make things better and he can’t.

So instead of my usual knee-jerk irritability at what I perceive as his lack of sensitivity, I say, “I’m terrified and I just need you to listen.” Which he does, patiently, lovingly. After I’ve finished reciting my laundry list of fears, he holds me close and neither of us says anything for a long time. We don’t need to.

It’s the connection, stupid!”

By Barbara Graham from O, The Oprah Magazine

google.com bobrdobr.ru del.icio.us technorati.com linkstore.ru news2.ru rumarkz.ru memori.ru moemesto.ru

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars (Have not been rated yet)
Загрузка ... Загрузка ...

Comments

Leave a Reply

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up. Patience is a virtue; there is no need to re-submit your comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.